Donna Laframboise (Canada)
"The IPCC admits that it does not conduct any research. It’s in the
business of writing reports. Reports that are thousands of pages long.
Five of those reports have been written over the past 25 years. IPCC personnel are expected to survey the scientific literature and
write a report about what that literature says about climate change. In the process, these people make thousands of judgment calls. They
decide that some studies are worth paying attention to – and that others
belong in the dustbin. Some – still unproven – assumptions are taken seriously at the IPCC. Others are dismissed.
Judgment calls are not science. They’re relying on their knowledge of
scientific matters, but IPCC personnel are actually playing a role
similar to jurors at a trial. When a jury evaluates evidence and draws conclusions no one calls that ‘science.’So where, exactly does ‘science’ happen at the IPCC? Is this really a ‘scientific body?’
No comments:
Post a Comment